
Lack of Objectivity?
I found this book upsetting not because it dealt with ghosts and the paranormal but because of the methods used to contact the entity Harmon calls Mary Bell. Don’t get me wrong it’s a compelling story and Harmon explores the paranormal thoroughly in part because he’s a retired Texas policeman. After he retires from police work he and his family relocate from Texas to Fort Collins, Colorado. They begin to have odd occurrences in their new house, noises, feelings, and sightings. Harmon starts to film these goings on and notices some orbs. He decides to gathers his family at the kitchen to actively try and whoever is causing this. This is where I had my first negative reaction to his methods. He has an older teenage daughter living with him from his first marriage as well as three younger daughters with his current wife. The younger girls are 3, 5, and 7 years old and they tell their dad they’re scared and don’t want to participate in the séance (Harmon repeatedly refers to it as ‘contacting the ghost’ rather than calling it a séance) but Ken tells them they have to be there. He goes so far as telling them to play singing games while he films because he’s noticed that seems to attract the ghost. I’m not in any way saying he was purposely trying to harm his kids but this seems very short sighted to me. In fact his entire story seems tunnel visioned, he narrowly walks the line of being obsession in my opinion.
I know as a cop he was charged with being thorough in his research methods with the goal of proving his case against the bad guys in order to protect others. I respect that tremendously. Communicating with ghosts however, is a completely different matter. In my opinion working with those who can’t or haven’t moved on after their death has a completely different goal with different research methods. The goal should be to help the entity resolve the reason why they can’t move on, it shouldn’t be to fulfill the researcher’s need to know more about what happens after death. Another line I feel Harmon crosses is in the last chapter where he asks the ghost some unsolved mysteries such as a) was Amelia Earhart captured by the Japanese, b) was Marilyn Monroe murdered, c) did the US really land on the moon, etc. Again this is the researcher’s curiosity and in no way helps the ghost and more importantly there’s no reason someone would know the answers to such questions merely because they’ve died and remained attached to the earth? I do believe ghosts exist and that research into the paranormal is legitimate but I’m not at all convinced that whoever or whatever Harmon was in contact with was who he thought she was. I also think he became overly involved and lost sight of the big picture which was why the entity was still earthbound. In another review someone said Harmon was not a good writer. I’d agree that he’s not inspired but he does write clearly which makes the story easy to follow; I would have liked more objectivity applied to the subject and more sensitivity to his family however.
This review is based on an e-galley supplied by the publisher.